Design Helps
Keep Prisoners Under Lock and Key
Design-build method cuts time
needed to put up federal prison in Indiana
by Craig Barner
Design and choice of materials will ensure the security of
inmates and staff at the $105 million United States Penitentiary
II in Terre Haute, Ind.
A rectangle makes up the campus of the maximum-security federal
prison, said Nathan Moore, project architect with Fort Wayne,
Ind.-based Schenkel Shultz Architecture, partner in the Clark
/Hagerman/Schenkel Shultz Joint Venture design-build team.
An inwardly focused series of more than a dozen buildings
offers inmates little opportunity to look out of the site
and dream of escape.
Two sets of three V-shaped housing pods face each other across
a compound. At one end of the rectangle is a group of buildings
used for activities that include maintenance, personal services,
food service and health services. At the other end, structures
slated for religious education and recreation close off the
compound, said Jeff Hagerman, vice president in the Indianapolis
office of Fort Wayne, Ind.-based Hagerman Construction Corp.,
a member of the joint-venture partnership.
A secured corridor of enclosed space surrounds the compound.
The corridor's interior wall is the back sides of the housing
pods, and the exterior wall is composed of precast concrete
wall panels, Hagerman said. Beyond that is "no man's
land" and three circuits of taut-wire fencing. Six guard
towers with sight lines into the compound are just outside
the fencing, and a seventh guard tower is back in the middle
of the compound.
Closed-circuit TV cameras monitor the prison's critical areas,
and a control room outside the secured perimeter can open
and close key access points into structures that include the
housing pods, the secured corridor and the main entrance.
"Security and safety for inmates, guards and staff is
the entire focus," Moore said.
Indeed, a design change was implemented to add security frames
with bars to cells in the special housing unit, where the
death penalty is carried out.
Prisoners will be in cells formed of precast concrete, said
Joe Smith, vice president with Clark Construction Group Inc.,
a joint-venture partner. Precast was selected as the primary
cell material because of the speed of erection it afforded.
Mesh in the precast gives it additional strength.
Cast-in-place concrete is used, too, for the floor slabs and
roofs, Smith said. The thickness of these elements - 8 in.
for the floor slabs and 7.5 in. for the roofs - will deter
escapes. The roof also has a metal deck and exterior membrane.
A Prison Paucity
The project is next to an existing prison, which is where
Timothy McVeigh, the infamous Oklahoma City bomber, suffered
the death penalty.
The new facility is being built primarily because of a lack
of space to lock up the large number of convicts found guilty
of offenses against federal laws. Nine additional federal
prisons are under construction in other parts of the country,
and two others are in design, Smith said.
He added that 960 cells approximately 7 ft. wide by 14 ft.
long comprise the prison under way in Terre Haute. The cells
are formed as five-sided boxes - four walls and a roof. Two
cells, one atop another, make up a unit. A balcony fronts
the upper cell.
The cells were manufactured in special forms in West Burlington,
Iowa, where Raider Precast is based. They were cured, finished
and painted, and furnishings that include bed, sink and mirror,
toilet, writing table and locker were installed.
A large number of components contained within the precast
- conduit runs, imbeds for bearing members and block-outs
for penetrations - required close coordination, Smith said.
"We had several meetings prior to casting and made several
plant visits," he added.
The shrink-wrapped cell units were shipped to Terre Haute,
where they were erected and utilities installed. "The
onsite erection is pretty fast," Smith said.
An important project element is the "very large"
central utility plant, which supplies the existing prison,
the facility under way and a future detention center, Smith
said. Having maintenance personnel in one facility, rather
than three, was an efficiency the Federal Bureau of Prisons
sought for the site.
Some of the mechanical, electrical and plumbing work was intricate.
The steam lines and the electrical bank to the existing facility,
for example, were laid about 1.5 to 2 miles, and they were
encased in concrete near the jail for security.
Four different materials were used to hold up the new prison:
masonry bearing walls, structural steel, concrete columns
and even precast panels.
"When you have an exterior precast wall, for instance,
it doesn't make sense to add columns and pilasters when you
can design the wall with a little added steel to carry the
end of the [ceiling] joist," Smith said.
More than 2,000 precast wall panels clad structures on the
site, said Collin Wagenbach, general manager of Raider Precast.
Smith's colleagues in the project included Terry Grams, senior
project manager, and Lewis Roberson, senior superintendent.
The 1.2 million-sq.-ft. project is expected to be complete
in April.
Speed of Design-Build
The design-build method was used primarily to accelerate the
project and realize cost savings. Design started in July 2001,
the design-build contract was awarded the following November
and the design was complete in July 2002.
As in most design-build projects, coordination ensured that
everyone was cognizant of the design status, Moore said. An
Internet-based project management system, Constructware, was
used to keep key team members up to date on design plans,
proposed changes and approved modifications.
The software proved useful because 38 modification proposal
requests, or formal changes proposed by the prison bureau,
were incorporated in the final design. Other nomenclature
was adopted to ensure team members could keep track of what
was being communicated and by whom. Responses of the design-build
team to MPRs were called construction bulletins, and changes
made to the final design were referred to as architect's supplemental
instructions.
About three to four months were saved through the use of the
design-build method, Moore said. "You don't have a full-blown
bidding process," he added. "Right there, on this
kind of job, you probably have a two-month bidding window
alone."
Site, Weather Issues
The extra time was needed because some unusual issues were
encountered on the project.
Loose, sandy soil that would affect the strength of the foundation
lay on the site, Smith said. The soil was compacted to fortify
it.
A crane was brought in to drop a 10-ton disk on the ground,
he said. The crater was filled in, and a smaller disk was
dropped until a 3,000- to 5,000 lbs.-per-sq.-ft. strength
of the soil was achieved throughout the site.
The compaction allowed the use of spread footings, a shallow
foundation type, for the buildings.
The weather was a battle because the recent winter was unusually
cold. Heaters allowed the slabs on grade to be poured and
the grouting of the precast to be done.
Other kinds of climate also affected the project, such as
rain and wind. "We worked through the winter months for
the erection if the wind would allow us," Smith said.
|