|
Terminals 2 and 3 Air-handling Unit
Replacement at
O'Hare International Airport
Project
of The Year: Industrial
Forty-two air-handling units have been replaced in terminals
2 and 3 at O'Hare International Airport in Chicago.
The project also included the replacement and-or modification
of the city's electrical switchgear, installation of new motor
control centers and installation of supporting electrical
services for the new equipment and existing equipment.
The fire protection sprinkler system was added in terminals
2 and 3 penthouses. During the phased demolition and reconstruction
of the penthouse air handling unit systems, a temporary air
handling system that included cooling, heating and electrical
power was also provided.
Had Old Equipment
The work involved replacing existing penthouse HVAC equipment
that was originally installed in the 1960s.
The mechanical equipment rooms were congested, poorly illuminated
and did not allow adequate access for equipment/systems maintenance.
Existing structures were so aged that common tasks required
special care to prevent the infiltration of noise and water
to public areas.
The project had several requirements.
Airlines and airport operations could not be affected, and
all existing services were to remain completely operational
so that airport users were unaware of the renovation other
than what could be seen on the roof.
System quality that was equal to or better than existing systems
was to be provided.
Coordination was necessary with other Department of Aviation
and airline construction projects in progress in preparation
for O'Hare's expansion.
The new systems were oversized in terms of physical size and
capacity to accommodate future terminal expansion. The points
of connection between new and existing systems occasionally
conflicted in terms of size, type and orientation.
The equipment was hoisted using operational aircraft gates
as crane and truck staging areas, and day-to-day coordination
was required between the contractors, airlines, control tower
personnel and Department of Aviation staff.
Full security screening was applied to workers, materials,
equipment and trucks.
Temporary System Installed
A temporary HVAC system was installed that provided year-round
climate control to all spaces with systems out of service
due to the project.
The temporary system included the installation of two 250-ton,
50,000-cu.-ft.-per-minute rooftop units.
They were put on a temporary steel structure constructed on
the penthouse roof. The units were located on opposite ends
of the structured and connected by a 72-in.-dia., double wall
spiral duct system.
Temporary supply and return ducts connected the spiral system
to existing zone duct penetrations at the penthouse floor
and allowed for demolition of the penthouse area for each
phase of work.
The orientation of the replacement air-handling units created
logistical conflicts.
Originally, demolition and replacement of two air-handling
units on opposite ends of the penthouse was the goal. The
related mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems crossed
over or under new or existing work.
This resulted in physical limitations that created numerous
construction, operation and maintenance issues.
An alternative plan was developed that consolidated the scope
of work that allowed for simultaneous demolition and replacement
of five to six air-handling units per phase. This resulted
in savings of $225,000 and 90 days of work.
Physical space was limited, yet five to six new air handling
units that were 12-by-25-ft. each, related equipment and up
to 80-person crews were to be accommodated in an area that
was about 6,000 sq. ft. Staggered start times, shift work
and weekend work allowed individual trade crews to concentrate
on their respective tasks in sequence.
The Department of Aviation wanted to tie the existing campus
temperature control system monitoring into a new open-protocol
temperature control system, and the new BacNET open-control
temperature was installed.
The jury said, "The issues of dealing with the city of
Chicago's bureaucracy are always extensive, yet this project
was delivered 90 days early. The project was on a 24-hour/seven-day-a-week
schedule. It was diabolically challenging.
That it was done on time was a miracle."
|