homepage home
subscribe to Midwest Construction magazine subscribe
newsletters free e-newsletter
advertise
industry jobs industry jobs
Mcgraw-Hill Construction Logo
Midwest Construction Logo
Order Your RISK FREE Subscription
comment

Team Wins Top AASHTO Award for Saving $48 Million of Highway Section’s Life-Cycle Cost

Text size: A A

The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) recently presented its 2009 Value Engineering Award to a team from the Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation (WisDOT) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) whose value engineering will cut $48 million from the life-cycle cost of 33 miles of Interstate 94 in south-central Wisconsin

Darrell Berry (second from left), formerly of the Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation and now of Mead & Hunt, and Peter Garcia (third from left) of the Federal Highway Administration, accept the AASHTO Value Engineering Award at the National Value Engineering Conference.
Photo courtesy of Mead & Hunt
Darrell Berry (second from left), formerly of the Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation and now of Mead & Hunt, and Peter Garcia (third from left) of the Federal Highway Administration, accept the AASHTO Value Engineering Award at the National Value Engineering Conference.
----- Advertising -----

I-94 is the busy Interstate that connects Milwaukee to Madison, Wis. The total length from city to city is about 79 miles. The award-winning WisDOT-FHWA value-engineering study focused on 33 miles from the western edge of Waukesha County to just east of Madison.

That segment of I-94 needs repair, and traffic projections show the need to expand it from four lanes to six by 2026.

WisDOT commissioned a value engineering (VE) study to help decide the best approach to rehabilitating and reconstructing the segment.

The I-94 VE Study developed and evaluated six alternatives, in addition to the original, .

The original alternative had a life-cycle cost of $195 million. The VE study’s recommended alternative has a life-cycle cost of $147 million—a savings of $48 million, or 24.6%.

In addition to saving cost, the WisDOT-FHWA team’s recommended alternative simplifies traffic control and does not require temporary widening to add and remove lanes.

The recommended alternative’s short time of interim work and use of standard techniques simplifies construction and minimizes user impacts. It also improves shoulders, flattens or shields steep side slopes, corrects cross slope on the mainline, and provides capacity when needed.

WisDOT adopted the VE team’s recommendation and is proceeding with this best-value solution.

 

----- Advertising -----
Blog: ENR Midwest Musings
ENR Midwest Musings delivers the latest news, insights and opinions about construction & design in Illinois, Indiana, Wisconsin and Missouri, as well as Iowa, Ohio, Michigan and Minnesota.
Reader Photos
Photos from ENR Photo Showcase
----- Advertising -----
 Reader Comments:

Sign in to Comment

To write a comment about this story, please sign in. If this is your first time commenting on this site, you will be required to fill out a brief registration form. Your public username will be the beginning of the email address that you enter into the form (everything before the @ symbol). Other than that, none of the information that you enter will be publically displayed.

We welcome comments from all points of view. Off-topic or abusive comments, however, will be removed at the editors’ discretion.